Understanding the Virginia Plan and the New Jersey Plan

The Virginia Plan and the New Jersey Plan: A Comparison

The Virginia Plan and the New Jersey Plan were two key proposals put forth during the Constitutional Convention of 1787. These plans presented different approaches to the structure of the legislative branch in the newly forming United States government. It is essential to understand the differences between these two plans and their respective supporters.

The Virginia Plan

The Virginia Plan, supported by larger states, suggested a bicameral legislature based on population. This meant that states with larger populations would have more representatives in the legislative body. The Virginia Plan was primarily backed by states such as Virginia, Pennsylvania, and Massachusetts, which favored a system where their larger populations would be adequately represented.

The New Jersey Plan

The New Jersey Plan, supported by smaller states, proposed a unicameral legislature with equal representation for each state. This plan aimed to ensure that regardless of a state's size or population, each state would have an equal say in the legislative process. States like New Jersey, Delaware, and Connecticut were among the main proponents of this plan.

The Great Compromise

Ultimately, the U.S. Constitution adopted a compromise between the Virginia Plan and the New Jersey Plan, known as The Great Compromise. This compromise established a bicameral legislature, with the House of Representatives based on population (fulfilling the Virginia Plan's proposal) and the Senate granting equal representation to each state (aligning with the New Jersey Plan).

Conclusion

The Virginia Plan and the New Jersey Plan represented differing viewpoints on the structure of the legislative branch and the representation of states within the government. Through the adoption of the Great Compromise, the United States was able to find a middle ground that satisfied both larger and smaller states, leading to the establishment of a functional and fair system of government.

Question:

Which of these options most accurately matches the Virginia Plan and the New Jersey Plan with their supporters?

Final answer:

The Virginia Plan, supported by larger states, proposed a bicameral legislature based on population. The New Jersey Plan, backed by smaller states, suggested a unicameral legislature with equal representation for each state. The Constitution adopted a blend of these two plans known as the Great Compromise.

Explanation:

The Virginia Plan and the New Jersey Plan were two propositions presented during the Constitutional Convention in 1787. The Virginia Plan, advocated by larger states, called for a bicameral legislature based on population. Thus, larger states would have greater representation. It was supported primarily by larger, more populous states like Virginia, Pennsylvania, and Massachusetts.

On the other hand, the New Jersey Plan, favored by smaller states, proposed a unicameral legislature where each state had equal representation. Smaller states such as New Jersey, Delaware, and Connecticut predominantly supported this plan. Ultimately, the U.S. Constitution adopted a blend of these two plans, often referred to as the Great Compromise.

← Unlocking the power of taxes overcoming misconceptions and embracing responsibility Exploring andrew jackson s democratic presidency →