Understanding the Elements of an Argument

What are the elements of this argument?

The elements of the argument presented can be broken down as follows: A. Premise: David is required to attend weekly strengthening workshops. Conclusion: David is a football player. B. Premise: All football players are required to attend weekly strengthening workshops. Conclusion: David is a football player. C. Premise: David is a football player. Conclusion: David is required to attend weekly strengthening workshops. D. Premise: All football players are required to attend weekly strengthening workshops. David is a football player. Conclusion: David is required to attend weekly strengthening workshops. The correct answer is D: Premise: All football players are required to attend weekly strengthening workshops. David is a football player. Conclusion: David is required to attend weekly strengthening workshops.

Understanding the Elements of an Argument

In analyzing the given argument, it is important to understand the structure of an argument, which typically consists of premises and a conclusion. Premises are statements that serve as the foundation for the argument, while the conclusion is the statement that is drawn based on those premises. Let's break down each element of the argument:

Premise A: David is required to attend weekly strengthening workshops.

This statement serves as a premis. It establishes the fact that David has an obligation to participate in weekly strengthening workshops.

Conclusion A: David is a football player.

This conclusion is drawn based on the premise that David is required to attend the weekly strengthening workshops. The argument suggests that David's participation in these workshops indicates that he is a football player.

Premise B: All football players are required to attend weekly strengthening workshops.

This statement sets the premise that all individuals who are football players must attend the weekly strengthening workshops. It establishes a general requirement for football players.

Conclusion B: David is a football player.

Based on the premise that all football players are required to attend the workshops, the conclusion states that David, who attends the workshops, is therefore considered a football player.

Conclusion D: David is required to attend weekly strengthening workshops.

This conclusion is based on the premise that all football players must participate in the workshops and the fact that David is identified as a football player. The argument concludes that due to his status as a football player, David is obligated to attend the workshops.

Therefore, the correct interpretation of the argument lies in option D, as it aligns with the premises provided and leads to a logical conclusion based on the given information.

← Calmness and indifference a reflective analysis Internal or external conflict in the lion king →