Determining Fallacious Reasoning

Why Ignoring Other Behaviors Is Fallacious Reasoning

Experts have linked the increase in teen car accidents to an increase in the use of social media while driving. Teen drivers are using social media to take selfies while driving. This behavior causes dangerous driving situations that may result in deadly accidents. The only way to stop teen accidents caused by distracted driving is to block social media apps while a car is in motion.

The author fails to recognize other behaviors that cause distracted driving. This statement best explains why this is an example of fallacious reasoning. By solely focusing on social media use as the cause of teen car accidents, the author overlooks other factors contributing to distracted driving. There are various behaviors that can lead to distractions while driving, such as eating, texting, or adjusting the radio. Ignoring these other forms of distraction presents a narrow view of the issue and fails to address the complexity of teen driving accidents.

Which statement best explains why this is an example of fallacious reasoning?

The best explanation for why the reasoning is fallacious is because it ignores other forms of distracted driving beyond social media use. It assumes that blocking social media apps alone will prevent teen driving accidents, which is an overly simplistic view of the issue.